Saturday, May 22, 2010

Comment on this fantasy baseball trade?

Barry Bonds Sucks (Players to Trade)


Rankings Batting


Batters Opp: 5/29 O-Rank Rank H/AB R HR RBI SB AVG


Michael Barrett


(ChC - C) Fla 180 285 40/160 14 7 25 0 .250


Ian Kinsler


(Tex - 2B) @Oak 45 67 41/165 26 10 27 7 .248


Justin Morneau


(Min - 1B) CWS 22 16 55/189 34 15 39 0 .291


Rankings Pitching


Pitchers Opp: 5/29 O-Rank Rank IP W SV K ERA WHIP


Jonathan Papelbon


(Bos - RP) Cle 66 77 18.1 0 12 26 1.47 0.98


Jason Marquis


(ChC - SP) ^Fla 219 63 65.2 5 0 34 2.60 1.02





Bambino/Kirbster (Players to Trade)


Rankings Batting


Batters Opp: 5/29 O-Rank Rank H/AB R HR RBI SB AVG


Russell Martin


(LAD - C) @Was 61 30 51/166 31 3 33 8 .307


Bill Hall


(Mil - 3B,SS,OF) Atl 93 209 45/172 24 6 20 1 .262


Vladimir Guerrero


(LAA - OF) Sea 5 10 56/167 28 10 40 1 .335


Rankings Pitching


Pitchers Opp: 5/29 O-Rank Rank IP W SV K ERA WHIP


Jason Isringhausen


(StL - RP) @Col 192 59 19.0 1 13 14 1.42 0.79


Brad Penny


(LAD - SP) ^@Was 20

Comment on this fantasy baseball trade?
so, basically it's





Barrett + Kinsler + Morneau + Papelbon + Marquis being traded for





Martin + Hall + Vlad + Isringhausen + Penny





It's fairly even -- depending on what both teams need. Hall for Kinsler is a push, and so is Penny for Marquis -- like getting virtually the same player in return in both cases.





"Barry Bonds Sucks" team is getting the better catcher in Martin, and a better power source in Guerrero, because Vlad will have a higher AVG and can steal probably 15 SB's by the end of the year if he wants to.





"Bambino/Kirbster" team is getting a better closer in Papelbon even though Izzy's numbers are similar -- Boston has a much better team, and Papelbon will have many more save opportunities than Izzy will with the Cardinals.





Overall, I'd say "Barry Bonds Sucks" has the edge, primarily because Martin is head-and-shoulders above Barrett. Good trade though.
Reply:dude, way too confusing.. I dont know who you are even trading.
Reply:Way too many players! Try to get 2 for 3 deals or 4 for 3.





I like the second teams better


No comments:

Post a Comment